The Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation (OSSTF) just lately made headlines after reaching an settlement with the Ontario authorities to keep away from the potential of a strike in its present spherical of negotiations.
In quick, the events agreed to enter into binding curiosity arbitration to resolve any excellent points ought to they fail to succeed in a negotiated settlement by Oct. 27, 2023. OSSTF members will quickly vote on whether or not to pursue this course of.
On the floor, curiosity arbitration is interesting as a result of it permits the events to keep away from a labour dispute and fingers duty for resolving excellent contentious points to a impartial third occasion.
However, there are numerous the explanation why buying and selling the proper to strike for binding curiosity arbitration is a minefield for unions — and why we as labour students and a few OSSTF members and retirees have been left scratching our heads at OSSTF’s resolution.
Outstanding bargaining points
Interest arbitration is a mechanism for resolving excellent bargaining points. It’s mostly utilized in situations the place important employees like firefighters or nurses are legally denied the proper to strike. Less usually, unions and employers use curiosity arbitration to realize a primary contract or resolve a contentious strike.
Once the events negotiate to deadlock, a impartial third occasion — the arbitrator — known as in to settle the excellent points. The result’s binding on each events.
In the case of OSSTF’s current settlement with the province, it had not bargained to deadlock, not to mention performed a strike vote to check members’ resolve and attempt to change the employer’s place.
Interest arbitration is not any panacea
Interest arbitration is seductive for unions given current choices which have awarded main wage will increase to Ontario nurses and different health-care employees to compensate for the results of Bill 124, which capped public sector wage will increase at one per cent per yr and has been deemed unconstitutional.
For employees whose wages have fallen behind over a few years, the prospect of catching up with out having to construct for a possible strike is tantalizing.
Demobilizes unions
However, there are not less than 4 the explanation why prematurely agreeing to binding curiosity arbitration is extremely problematic for unions.
First, it normalizes the concept that the proper to strike is pointless. That type of considering demobilizes unions and renders members passive. Because the arbitrator’s resolution is binding, members don’t get to vote on the ultimate settlement and due to this fact grow to be mere bystanders. In quick, curiosity arbitration ignores the important thing to unions’ energy — an organized and mobilized membership.
Second, reliance on curiosity arbitration can truly enhance bargaining impasses by decreasing the inducement to barter phrases that each events can dwell with. If a 3rd occasion goes to determine what the contract says, why budge from one’s preliminary bargaining place?
Researchers name this the “narcotic impact” as a result of each unions and administration grow to be depending on curiosity arbitration to determine contract phrases. The drawback is that imposed settlements not often resolve the underlying conflicts.
Interest arbitration is an inherently conservative course of. There is not any assure that wage will increase in a single sector shall be reproduced in others. Furthermore, arbitration is a poor mechanism for addressing deeper points like the shortage of funding in public companies, which underpins the actual issues so many public sector employees face.
Read extra:
Canada’s excessive faculties are underfunded and turning to worldwide tuition to assist
Inherently conservative course of
Third, whereas the present context might yield first rate arbitration awards, particularly on wages and advantages, the financial panorama is continually altering. What might appear to be a very good tactic this time round might show disadvantageous in the long run. Changing course in future rounds of bargaining might grow to be tough if leaders and members grow to be invested in arbitration as the first course of for resolving contentious points.
Finally, arbitration relies on comparisons. That means the standard of arbitration awards relies on the relative success of different unions on the bargaining desk to set good wages, a few of whom are pressured to make use of the proper to strike to succeed in settlements that meet their members’ wants.
In different phrases, good agreements for arbitrators to make use of as comparisons require somebody main the best way. Unions that resort to curiosity arbitration by selection are primarily free driving on different unions which have preserved their proper to strike to safe improved phrases and situations of labor.
Union bargaining energy has elevated
The option to go for curiosity arbitration is much more perplexing provided that the situations for unions to win huge features on the bargaining desk are higher than they’ve been in a long time.
Inflation generates a variety of sympathy for employees whose wages usually are not conserving tempo. A good labour market additionally offers employees elevated leverage. Workers throughout the financial system are utilizing their proper to strike to get forward.
Forfeiting the proper to strike and selecting curiosity arbitration successfully undermines the bargaining place of different unions and helps gasoline divide-and-conquer labour relations methods.
Giving up rights?
In the case of the OSSTF, the Ontario authorities has already used its take care of the union to strain different training unions to observe swimsuit.
In current years, unions have gained hard-fought battles towards governments’ makes an attempt to strip away employees’ rights to cut price and strike.
After all this effort, voluntarily gifting away these rights and turning over all the facility to an arbitrator appears unthinkable. Anti-union governments don’t have to fret about limiting the proper to strike if unions are merely keen to surrender that proper in trade for the crutch of curiosity arbitration.
Stephanie Ross receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
Larry Savage receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
